The Qizilbash population of Uttar Pradesh, India
Mughul, Mughal. — One of
the four great Muhammadan sub-divisions known in Europe under the form Mongol.
Mr. Ibbetson1, writing of the Panjab, does not attempt to touch upon
“the much debated question of the distinction between the Turks and Mughuls. In
the Delhi territory, indeed, the villagers accustomed to describe the Mughuls
of the Empire as Turks, used the word as synonymous with ‘official’, and I have
heard my Hindu clerks of Kayasth class described as Turks, merely because they
were in Government employ. On the Biloch frontier the word Turk is commonly
used as synonymous with Mughul. The Mughuls proper probably either entered the
Panjab with Babar, or were attracted thither under the dynasty of his
successors; and I believe that the great majority of those who have returned
themselves as Mughuls in the Eastern Panjab really belong to that race.” In
these Provinces they say that they take their name from their ancestor Mughul
Khan.
2.
In the last Census they are classed under three sub-divisions: Chaghtai,
Qazalbash, and Turkman. Writing of Afghanistan Dr. Bellew2 says: — “What
the origin of these new clans was, whether they were conquered and converted
Pathans, who became absorbed into the dominant tribe, and thus, by the mere
force of numbers and other favouring circumstances of the period, gave them
both their language and social code of laws; or whether they were kindred
tribes of Turks imported by Sabaktagin (that is, ‘the one called Sabak;’ as
Alaptakin, ‘the one called Alap,’ takin
being the distinctive affix of the names of Turk slaves), the founder of the
Turk Tatar (as distinguished from the Mongal or Mughul Tatar) dynasty at
Ghazni, is not clearly ascertained. Without excluding the possibility of their
increase by the occasional immigration of other kindred Turk clans from across
the Oxus, it may be considered more probable that the inrease in the clans of
the Ghilji took place mostly by the absorption and adoption of subjugated
native tribes; for we find several instances of Chaghatai Turk clans living in
close proximity to the Ghilji, yet quite distinct from them, and entirely
ignorant of any kindred connection with them. Such Turk clans are the Bayat
abont Ghazni and Herat, the Carlugh, Chung, and Mughal Turk (Yaka, Chirikcha,
etc.) of Balkh, etc. Such also are the Mongol and Chaghatai Turk clans of
Mangal, Jaji, Jadran, Khitai, etc., who are settled about the Pewar and the
head-waters of the Kurram river, and who were brought to these situations on
the invasions of Changhis and Tymur — the Tatar scourges of the world during
the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries. These clans, with the exception of the
Jadran, though they have almost entirely lost the typical physiognomy of their
race, their mother tongue, and indeed, everything else, but their names, which
would connect them with their original stock, hold themselves entirely
distinct, political relations always excepted, from the Ghilji, who are their
neighbours.”
3.
Other clans in these Provinces are the Qazalbash or Qizilbash, “red heads”,
Uzbak, Turk, Kai, Chak, Tajik. In the Panjab the main tribes are the Chaghtai
and Barla. Some of these, especially the Chaghtai, are claimed by the Bhatti
Jadons to have descended from them when they were rulers of Ghazni and
Zabalistan. The last Imperial family was drawn from the Chaghtai. The Jhojha
also call themselves Mughul, but they are supposed to be slaves of Mughul or
low caste Hindus converted to Islam by some Mughul nobleman. They are not
suffered to intermarry with the Rajput Musulmans, or with any of the pure
Muhammadan tribes.3
Distribution of the Mughuls according to the Census of
1891:
Districts
|
Chaghtai
|
Qazalbash
|
Turkman
|
Others
|
Total
|
Dehra Dun
|
108
|
—
|
—
|
93
|
201
|
Saharanpur
|
477
|
1
|
30
|
1,916
|
2,424
|
Muzaffarnagar
|
305
|
16
|
832
|
578
|
1,731
|
Meerut
|
880
|
5
|
40
|
1,181
|
2,106
|
Bulandshahr
|
780
|
17
|
9
|
1,657
|
2,463
|
Aligarh
|
16
|
—
|
101
|
785
|
902
|
Mathura
|
112
|
56
|
15
|
215
|
398
|
Agra
|
520
|
26
|
76
|
1,400
|
2,022
|
Farrukhabad
|
375
|
—
|
27
|
673
|
1,075
|
Mainpuri
|
100
|
—
|
—
|
117
|
217
|
Etawah
|
162
|
—
|
9
|
460
|
631
|
Etah
|
264
|
2
|
15
|
415
|
696
|
Bareilly
|
1,162
|
—
|
1
|
2,040
|
3,203
|
Bijnor
|
1,341
|
7
|
—
|
489
|
1,837
|
Budaun
|
809
|
26
|
3
|
618
|
1,456
|
Moradabad
|
713
|
77
|
2,015
|
9,629
|
12,434
|
Shahjahanpur
|
721
|
2
|
39
|
561
|
1,323
|
Pilibhit
|
338
|
—
|
—
|
406
|
744
|
Fatehpur
|
708
|
—
|
—
|
594
|
1,302
|
Banda
|
103
|
2
|
10
|
299
|
414
|
Hamirpur
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
468
|
468
|
Allahabad
|
42
|
—
|
—
|
487
|
529
|
Jhansi
|
65
|
—
|
—
|
213
|
278
|
Jalaun
|
122
|
—
|
218
|
317
|
657
|
Lalitpur
|
10
|
—
|
1
|
53
|
64
|
Benares
|
123
|
—
|
—
|
997
|
1,120
|
Mirzapur
|
55
|
—
|
—
|
265
|
320
|
Jaunpur
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
548
|
548
|
Ghazipur
|
227
|
—
|
18
|
319
|
564
|
Ballia
|
17
|
—
|
—
|
193
|
210
|
Gorakhpur
|
332
|
3
|
11
|
943
|
1,289
|
Basti
|
81
|
—
|
—
|
1.696
|
1,777
|
Azamgarh
|
139
|
—
|
256
|
1,632
|
2,027
|
Kumaun
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
10
|
10
|
Garhwal
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
40
|
40
|
Tarai
|
1
|
—
|
—
|
143
|
144
|
Lucknow
|
1,370
|
673
|
37
|
11,143
|
13,223
|
Unao
|
249
|
6
|
6
|
646
|
907
|
Rae Bareli
|
211
|
27
|
—
|
362
|
600
|
Sitapur
|
1,084
|
69
|
50
|
1,225
|
2,428
|
Hardoi
|
—
|
1
|
—
|
427
|
725
|
Kheri
|
864
|
—
|
—
|
520
|
1,384
|
Faizabad
|
1,102
|
190
|
—
|
1,378
|
2,670
|
Gonda
|
780
|
—
|
86
|
527
|
1,393
|
Bahraich
|
429
|
15
|
20
|
883
|
1,347
|
Sultanpur
|
118
|
—
|
—
|
784
|
902
|
Partabgarh
|
38
|
—
|
5
|
348
|
391
|
Barabanki
|
721
|
—
|
—
|
466
|
1,187
|
Total
|
19,038
|
1,237
|
3,982
|
52,416
|
76,683
|
1) Panjab Ethnography, paras. 506, 507.
2) The Races of Afghanistan, 101.
3) Williams, Oudh
Census Report, 76; Raja Lahman Sinh, Bulandshahr
Memo., 191. sq.
William Crooke — The Tribes and Castes of the
North-Western Provinces and Oudh. Volume [04] (1896)
No comments:
Post a Comment